Our Lord’s descent into hell is well
attested to by divine revelation. For example, Christ says, “as Jonah
was three days and three nights in the belly of a whale, so will the Son
of man be three days and three nights in the belly of the earth” (Mt. 12:40). Further, in Acts of the Apostles,
St. Peter says, “[David] foresaw and spoke of the resurrection of the
Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see
corruption” (2:31). Likewise in the Apostles’ Creed we profess, “He descended into hell.”
Besides making clear that the soul of
Christ descended into hell, these texts clearly refer the descent into
hell to the Person of Christ. And this is supremely fitting. For, since
the personal union of the Word of God with both His body and soul
remained even after death, whatever could be attributed to either of
these principles of His human nature, while they were separated, was
also attributable to God the Son. Thus, in the Apostles’ Creed we
profess that He (i.e., God the Son) was buried insofar as His body was
placed in the tomb. In like manner, we profess that God the Son
descended into hell on account of His soul going to the underworld.
Connected with this, St. Thomas Aquinas
points out that it is even true to say that “during the three days of
His death, the whole Christ was in the tomb, in hell, and in heaven, on
account of His Person, which was united to His body lying in the tomb,
and to His soul-harrowing hell, and which was subsisting in His divine
nature reigning in heaven” (Compendium Theologiae,
ch. 229). Indeed, insofar as by His divine immensity the Son of God
comprehends or contains all things, we must affirm that the whole Person
of Christ is both in every place and in all places put together, yet He
is not wholly contained by any one place nor by all places put together
(Summa Theologiae, III, q 52, a. 3, ad 3um).
When reflecting on our Lord’s harrowing
of hell, it is, of course, necessary to distinguish different meanings
of the name “hell.” In its most general meaning, “hell” signifies “the
underworld,” which the Hebrews refer to as, Sheol, and the Greeks call by the name, Hades (Catechism of the Catholic Church, #633). Further, as the Roman Catechism teaches, there are three main parts to the underworld. There is gehenna,
or hell in the strict sense, which is the abode of the damned. There is
also purgatory wherein the punishments, unlike those of gehenna, are cleansing and only temporary in character. Lastly, there is that part of the underworld known as “Abraham’s bosom” (see, Luke 16:22-26).
It was in here that “the souls of the just prior to the coming of
Christ the Lord were received, and where, without experiencing any sort
of pain, but supported by the blessed hope of redemption, they enjoyed
peaceful repose” (Roman Catechism, pt. 1, art. 5).
So, into which part or parts of hell did
Christ descend and why? Taking St. Thomas Aquinas as our guide, we can
affirm both that our Lord descended into all three parts of hell and
that He descended into only one part of hell (i.e., into Abraham’s
bosom). But to see how both of these statements are true without
contradiction, we must distinguish two ways in which something can be
somewhere.
Thinking of everyday examples first, it
is true that one and the same fire is simultaneously both in the
fireplace and in every part of the room which it heats. The fire is in
the fireplace as in a proper place, while it is in every part of the
room through its effect, that is, through the heat which it produces.
Likewise, it is true that one and the same musician is simultaneously
both on the stage and in every part of the concert hall. For the
musician is on the stage insofar as that is his proper place, yet he is
also present in every part of the concert hall through his effect, that
is, through the music that he produces.
Applying this distinction to our Lord’s
descent into hell, it is true to say that Christ’s soul, through its
essence, only entered Abraham’s bosom. Nonetheless, through its effect,
Christ’s soul was in some way present in every part of hell. As St.
Thomas puts it, “being in one part of hell, his effect in some way
spread to every part of hell, just as by suffering in one place on
earth, he liberated the whole world by His passion” (Summa Theologiae,
III, q. 52, a. 2). More specifically, St. Thomas teaches that the
proper effect of Christ in the underworld was the bestowal of the
beatific vision on the souls of the just waiting for Him in Abaham’s
bosom. This, properly speaking, constitutes the harrowing or despoiling
of hell. For, through granting the souls of the just the vision which
beatifies, the King of all things “robbed” hell of its most prized
possessions. But Christ’s presence in hell also had the effects of
giving hope of attaining eternal glory to the souls in purgatory and of
confounding and bewildering those in gehenna (Summa Theologiae, III, q. 52, a. 2).
These considerations, in turn, cast some
light on the reasons for God the Son’s descent into hell. For one
thing, He went there to manifest His power and authority to the
underworld. As St. Paul writes, “at Jesus’ name every knee must bend in
the heavens, on the earth, and under the earth, and every tongue
proclaim to the glory of God the Father: Jesus Christ in Lord!” (Phil.
2:10-11). But secondly, and more importantly, our Lord came to deliver
His loved ones from their exile. He came to reward those who, from our
first father, Adam, to His own foster-father, St. Joseph, had fought the
good fight and had finished the race. The King descended into Hell in
order to bring nothing less than His own beatific vision, the very
paradise which He promised to Dismas just a few hours before (Lk. 23:43), to these just and holy souls. (Read more.)