Take away the sovereign Pontiff and the Catholic Church would no longer be catholic. Moreover, without the supreme, effective, and authoritative pastoral office of Peter the unity of Christ’s Church would collapse. It would be vain to look for other principles of unity in place of the true one established by Christ Himself. As St. Jerome rightly observed: “There would be as many schisms in the Church as there are priests” (emphasis mine).This passage from the first encyclical of Paul VI, Ecclesiam Suam (1964, 110) focuses its attention on the pastoral authority of the pope. It is no less apropos today as it was during the Second Vatican Council. There are countless schisms in the Church today across the whole spectrum of belief, so that while liberal and conservative are unfortunate and inadequate appelatives in reference to Catholic belief, we nevertheless find it necessary to distinguish between the dissenters of both extremes. Often the argument is given, regardless where the dissenter lies along the spectrum, that this or that particular teaching of the Church is not “infallible.” It is the same argument, whether it has to do with Humanae Vitae or Dignitatis Humanae. (Read entire post.)
We would add that this cardinal principle of holy Church is not a supremacy of spiritual pride and a desire to dominate mankind, but a primacy of service, ministration, and love. It is no vapid rhetoric which confers on Christ’s vicar the title: “Servant of the servants of God.”
A Change of Pace: Family Stories
7 hours ago
1 comment:
Case in point: Henry VIII's attempt to be "Catholic without the Pope" and placing himself in the center. One Anglican historian says that even Thomas Cranmer recognized Henry's title "Supreme Head and Governor of the Church" went too far: only Jesus can be the Head of the Church!
Post a Comment